Allowed¶21

Anil Singh & Anr. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC4 Jul 2025CRL.M.C./2179/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 528 BNSS FIR quashing; CRL.M.C. 2179/2025; Delhi High Court; Neena Bansal Krishna J.; FIR No.131/2017 PS Ghazipur; Sections 279/304A IPC rash/negligent driving causing death; crane accident death of minor child Baby Savita 17.05.2017; settlement deed dated 25.03.2025; compounding/quashing on settlement; Respondent No.3 no objection; MACT compensation Rs.5,20,000/-; additional payment Rs.60,000/-; chargesheet quashed qua all petitioners.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.131/2017 under Sections 279/304 A IPC registered at Police Station Ghazipur, with all subsequent proceedings and the Chargesheet, quashed qua all the Petitioners; Petition disposed of. ¶21

Anil Singh & Anr. Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~41

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 2179/2025

¶4

ANIL SINGH & ANR.

¶5

.....Petitioners

¶6

Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, Advocate.

¶7

versus

¶8

STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

¶9

.....Respondents Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, Ld. APP for State with SI Satya Kumar P.S. Ghazipur. Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate along with Respondent No.3 in person.

¶10

CORAM:

¶11

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 04.07.2025

¶12

A Petition under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the Petitioners for quashing of the FIR bearing No. 131/2017 under Sections 279/304A IPC, registered at Police Station Ghazipur.

¶13

Briefly stated, on 17.05.2017 at about 02:30 A.M the Petitioner was driving a Crane as there was repair work going on the Road. The Respondent No.3 along with her three year old daughter deboarded the bus and in the process the child Baby Savita came in front of the crane and unfortunately died. Accordingly, an FIR No.131/2017 under Sections 279/304 A IPC was registered at Police Station Ghazipur against the Petitioners.

¶14

It is submitted that Respondents have already received a sum of

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/07/2025 at 11:58:36

¶17

Rs.5,20,000/- from Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. It is further submitted that both the Petitioners and respondent No. 2 and 3 have already sorted out their all differences with the intervention of their respective persons of the vicinity vide Settlement Deed dated 25.03.2025 and they have left no grudge or grievance against each other in any manner whatsoever. By virtue of this Settlement Rs.60,000/- in addition have also been paid by the Petitioners to the Respondents. Therefore, the Petition be quashed.

¶18

The Respondent No.3 is present in the Court and submits that the matter stands settled with the Petitioners. She has no objection if the FIR is quashed against the petitioners on account of the settlement already arrived at between the parties.

¶19

The parties are present before this Court in-person today, and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer concerned.

¶20

In view of the submissions made, the Petition is allowed. Accordingly, FIR No.131/2017 under Sections 279/304 A IPC registered at Police Station Ghazipur with all the subsequent proceedings and the Chargesheet is hereby quashed qua all the Petitioners.

¶21

The Petition stands disposed of.

¶22

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

¶23

JULY 4, 2025 va

¶24

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/07/2025 at 11:58:36

Anil Singh & Anr. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Singh & Anr. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Padam Kumar Sharma Vs the State ( NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Vinod Kumar & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi through SHO Ps Rajouri Garden Delhi & Anr.

Nilesh Jindal Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Shri Vivek Vs the State Govt. of Nct.of Delhi

Pawan Yadav Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Karan Datta Vs State of NCT of Delhi