Petition sought quashing of a 498A/406/34 IPC FIR. Charge-sheet had been filed placing the petitioner in Column No. 12 without summons; the court held nothing survived and disposed of the petition with liberty to seek appropriate legal remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
KIRAN .....Petitioner
Through: Counsel for Petitioner (appearance not given)
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC for the State with SI Yogender, IO and S.I. Anup Rana, PS Hari Nagar. Mr. Biswajit Kumar Patra, Advocate for R2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 03.04.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/04/2025 at 13:08:08
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
APRIL 3, 2025/RS
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/04/2025 at 13:08:08
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition for quashing FIR No. 116/2021 survives when the petitioner has been placed in Column No. 12 of the charge-sheet and not summoned.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Kiran
State NCT of Delhi
Respondent No. 2
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
