Petitioner sought four weeks' parole under Article 226 and BNSS Section 528 to attend his niece's marriage, citing an FIR under Sections 302/34 IPC. After a status report was taken on record, counsel withdrew the petition, which was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~58
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chetan Bhardwaj, Ms. Priyal Bhardwaj, Mr. Dhanush Kumar and Mr. Pulkit Tripathi, Advs.
versus
STATE GNCT OF DELHI
.....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for State with Inspector Dharmendra Kumar, PS Ashok Vihar. Ms. Priyam Aggarwal, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.).
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
O R D E R % 20.05.2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 01:05:33
SHALINDER KAUR, J
MAY 20, 2025 /ss/kp
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 01:05:33
1 issue framed by the court
Whether parole should be granted to the petitioner for four weeks to attend his niece's marriage?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Bhutana
State GNCT of Delhi
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
