Disposed

Rakesh v. State through SHO Ps Vijay Vihar & Ors.

Delhi HC8 May 2025W.P.(CRL)/1348/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a habeas corpus petition regarding a missing daughter, the Court noted she was retrieved from a shelter and is willing to go with her father if he does not force a marriage against her will. As the father assured compliance, the petition was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Relief under Section 528 of BNS, 2023 for tracing the missing daughter was disposed of as the girl was traced and expressed willingness to go with the petitioner.

Rakesh Vs State through SHO Ps Vijay… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~3

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(CRL) 1348/2025 & CRL.M.A. 12657/2025 RAKESH .....Petitioner

¶4

Through: Mr. Dinesh Malik, Advocate from DHCLSC.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE THROUGH SHO PS VIJAY VIHAR & ORS. .....Respondents

¶7

Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Abhinav Kr. Arya and Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocates with W/S.I. Neha Khatri, P.S. Vijay Vihar. Ms. Pushplata Shokinda, Authority Superintendent, CHG Nirmal Chhaya

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR

¶10

O R D E R % 08.05.2025

¶11

By way of the present Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Surakasha Sanhita, 2023, the Petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of habeas corpus for a direction to be issued to the Respondents to trace and produce the daughter of the Petitioner, who is stated to be missing from Nirmal Chhaya, since December, 2024.

¶12

It is stated in the Writ Petition that the Petitioner’s daughter left her home on 15.07.2024. FIR No.262/2024 was registered at Police Station Vijay Vihar, Rohini on 18.07.2024 for an offence under Section 137(2) of the BNS, 2023. It is stated that the Petitioner’s daughter was retrieved in September, 2024 and she was kept in Nirmal Chhaya from where she again went missing.

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:39:43

¶14

Vide Order dated 28.04.2025, this Court had issued notice to the Respondents and had also directed the officials of Nirmal Chhaya to remain present in Court.

¶15

The officials from Nirmal Chhaya are present in Court today. It is stated that after the girl was kept in Nirmal Chhaya, she was handed over to her father i.e. the Petitioner on 17.09.2024, meaning thereby there is a misstatement in the Writ Petition wherein, the Petitioner has stated that his daughter went missing from Nirmal Chhaya.

¶16

Be that as it may, the daughter of the Petitioner has been retrieved and has been produced before the Court. We have interacted with the girl. She states that she wants to marry a boy, however, her father and other family members are against her marriage. The girl expressed her desire to go back with her father i.e. Petitioner herein provided the Petitioner/father of the girl does not force her to marry somebody else against her wish.

¶17

The Petitioner/father of the girl is also present in Court today. He states that he will not get his daughter married to somebody else against her wishes.

¶18

Since the daughter of the Petitioner has been traced and she is ready to go with the Petitioner, nothing survives in the instant Writ Petition.

¶19

With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of, along with the pending applications, if any.

¶20

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J.

¶21

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.

¶22

MAY 08, 2025 RJ

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:39:43

Rakesh v. State through SHO Ps Vijay Vihar & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh v. State through SHO Ps Vijay Vihar & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanofi India Limited & Anr. Vs Union of India

Tushar Kakkar & Ors. Vs the State (Govt.of N.C.T.) & Anr.

Aman @Sonu Vs State NCT of Delhi

Om Pal Singh Tomar Vs the State(Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Sharad Bhargava Vs Ncb

Rajender @ Kallu Vs State Gnct of Delhi & Ors.

Narinder Singh Bogarh @ Narinder Singh Vs Union of India & Anr.

Sh Intzar & Anr. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Union of India and Anr. Vs M/S Shatabdi Sales Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Manoj Kumar Vs Lt. Governor & Ors.

Pawan Kumar Vs the State NCT of Delhi through Its SHO Ps Bhajanpura

Bhawana Verma Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

M/S Contruction Indusry Development Council Vs M/S Mcm Worldwide Private Limied & Anr.

Ircon International Limited Vs Reacon Engineers (India) Pvt. Ltd.