Writ petition withdrawn by counsel due to typographical errors; court dismissed petition as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh. Exemption application allowed.
Liberty to withdraw and file petition afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~89
OM PAL SINGH TOMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. R.P.S. Bhati, Advocate
versus
THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC for the State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R
CRL.M.A. 14149/2025 (exemption)
W.P.(CRL) 1519/2025
DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
MAY 07, 2025/zp
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 01:17:20
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 01:17:20
Om Pal Singh Tomar
The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
