Petitioners sought withdrawal of their writ petition with liberty to raise all factual and legal contentions before the trial court, where proceedings were at the stage of conclusion of defence evidence. The court permitted withdrawal and disposed of pending applications without observations on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~68
versus
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Sr. Advocate alongwith Mr. Abhinav Agnihotri, Ms. Surpreet Kaur & Mr. Arani Chaudhary, Advocates. Mr. Anand V Khatri, ASC. SI Ravinder Chander, PS Amar Colony.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R
% 16.01.2025
After making some submissions, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all contentions, both factual and legal, before the learned trial court where the matter is pending at the stage of conclusion of defence evidence.
The petition is accordingly disposed-of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed-for; without making any observations on the merits of the matter. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
JANUARY 16, 2025/ ss
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 16:30:26
M/S Navyug Industries
State of NCT of Delhi
Anand V Khatri
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
