Vaibhav Jalan v. Union of India & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought liberty to withdraw a writ petition. The court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~43
Through: Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Adv. (through VC)
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for the State
Mr. Anupam S Sharrma, Special Counsel for ED Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Mr. Aayush Agarwala & Mr. Prakash Jha, Advs. for R3, R4 & R11
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 09.04.2025
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
APRIL 9, 2025 “SS”
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/04/2025 at 12:32:12
Vaibhav Jalan
Union of India
Amit Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court