A writ petition concerning FIR No. 193/2020 under Sections 307/34 IPC was disposed of after the State informed the court that a closure report had already been filed before the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, Additional Standing Counsel with SI Sanjay Kumar Singh & SI Ravindera Kumar Mr. Kunal Madan, Advocate for Complainant
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 08.04.2025
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
APRIL 8, 2025 r
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/04/2025 at 12:32:22
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Priyanka
State of NCT of Delhi
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
