Writ petition seeking directions to the SDM, Rohini to conclude section 145 CrPC proceedings pending for over ten years. The court directed the SDM to conclude and pass orders in accordance with law within 12 weeks and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~50
TILAK RAJ & ORS. .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. V.P. Dabas, Adv.
versus
STATE GNCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC with Mr. Alok Sharma, Mr. Vasu Agarwal, Advs. Inspector Yogendra Kr., PS Sultanpur
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
O R D E R % 15.01.2025 CRL.M.A. 969/2025
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(CRL) 112/2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 15:48:00
JASMEET SINGH, J
JANUARY 15, 2025/sp
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 15:48:00
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the SDM, Rohini should be directed to decide proceedings under section 145 CrPC pending for over 10 years within a fixed time.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tilak Raj & Ors.
State GNCT of Delhi
SDM, Rohini (Respondent No. 2)
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
