Accused persons sought quashing of an FIR under Sections 305/331(4) BNS on the basis of settlement with the complainant; the State opposed relying on a status report. Counsel sought withdrawal and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~50
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
JANUARY 16, 2025/ mt/AKT
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 15:37:06
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mukul
Kishan
State Govt of NCT of Delhi
Rajat Goyal
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
