Writ petition seeking directions to decide the petitioner's parole application. No application was on record with the Jail Superintendent; the court permitted the petitioner to file the petition itself as a parole application within a week and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
DEEPAK @ PETA
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Mr. Shashank Dey and Mr. Shiv Chopra, Advs.
versus
THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT, DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for State with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Mr. Nitish Dhawan, Ms. Chavi Lazarus and Ms. Sanskriti Nimbekar, Advs.
SI Shubhanshu, P.S. Kalyanpuri.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
O R D E R
% 09.04.2025
CRL.M.A. 10156/2025 (Exemption)
W.P.(CRL) 1071/2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2025 at 16:33:40
SHALINDER KAUR, J
APRIL 9, 2025/ sds /sk Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2025 at 16:33:40
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should direct the respondent to decide the petitioner's parole application.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Deepak @ Peta
The State (Govt of NCT, Delhi)
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
