Contempt petition alleging violation of a custody parole order and inhumane treatment during parole. The Jail Superintendent's report and the petitioner's own handwritten note showed he had availed custody parole to his satisfaction with no grievance, so proceedings were dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
GAUTAM VYAPARI .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Apoorva Thakral & Mr. Arpit Sharma, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy CGSC, Mr. Mohammad Junaid Mahmood, Ms. Usha Jamnal, Ms. Prajna Pandita, Advs. for UOI. Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Ms. Mansi Rao & Ms. Mamta Saha, Advs. for victims/prosecutrix. SI Seema Bhati, PS-Tigri.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R % 12.11.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/11/2025 at 12:07:14
VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J
MANOJ JAIN, J
NOVEMBER 12, 2025/rs/kp
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/11/2025 at 12:07:14
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the jail authorities violated this Court's order granting custody parole to the petitioner and treated him inhumanely during it?
Gautam Vyapari
State of NCT of Delhi
Vivek Chaudhary
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
