Momina v. State (Nct of Delhi)
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against criminal conviction abated due to the demise of the appellant during the pendency of the appeal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5 (Regular)
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.A. 56/2017 MOMINA .....Appellant Through: Mr. S.K. Sethi, Adv.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for State with SI Gaurav, PS Kalyanpuri.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R
- % 17.11.2025
- The appellant herein, along with her son, faced trial for offences punishable under Sections 498A, 302, 304B, 34, and 174A of IPC.
- Insofar as the present appellant is concerned, she was convicted for offences under Sections 498A and 174A of the IPC.
- However, during the pendency of the present appeal, the appellant has expired.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
MOMINA
- respondent
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Coram
VIVEK CHAUDHARY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court