A contempt petition seeking initiation of proceedings against the respondent for breach of an agreement was dismissed as withdrawn by the learned counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~60
Through: Ms. Sonakshi Chaturvedi, Advocate (through VC).
versus
SWAPNIL KUMAR .....Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R % 11.08.2025
“a) allow the present petition and pass directions for initiating contempt proceedings under the provision of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the Respondent for wilful disobedience and deliberate breach of Memorandum of Understanding dated 02.01.2023 and Affidavit dated 11.12.2023 filed by the Respondent in HMA 319/2024 titled as “Swapnil Kumar and Shubhi Saxena” in terms of guidelines laid down in Rajat Gupta vs. Rupali Gupta, reported as 2018 SCC OnLine Del 9005; or
b) pass such other order as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the present case.”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 11:55:06
accordingly.
AMIT SHARMA, J
AUGUST 11, 2025 /sn
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 11:55:06
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shubhi Saxena
Swapnil Kumar
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
