Petitioner sought security cover as a CBI witness. The respondent reported the petitioner is no longer a witness. The prior order directing threat assessment was superseded by the DCP's finding of no threat. Petition withdrawn and dismissed.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn, retaining liberty to seek remedies regarding the security threat assessment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
ABHISHEK VERMA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Mr. Dinhar Takiar, Ms. Sanjana Nair, Mr. Jangi Narang, Adv and Mr. Mudit Marwah, Advs.
versus
ANKIT CHAUHAN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Tiwari, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Aakash Pathak, CGSC with Mr. Ayush Tanwar, Advocates for respondent No.1
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 02.04.2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/04/2025 at 12:28:19
ANISH DAYAL, J
APRIL 2, 2025/RK/na
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/04/2025 at 12:28:19
Abhishek Verma
Ankit Chauhan
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
