Contempt petition over allegedly defamatory utterances by the respondent. Counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to pursue appropriate remedy; the court noted no observations were made on merits and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~51
VARTIKA KATIYAR .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Sumitra Chaudhary, Mr. M.K. Raghav Raman, Ms. Jasmine Sheikh, Ms. Nitya Sharma and Ms. Muskan, Advs.
versus
ROOPA DIVAKAR MOUDGIL .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 03.04.2025
ANISH DAYAL, J
APRIL 3, 2025/MK/na
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/04/2025 at 12:50:17
VARTIKA KATIYAR
ROOPA DIVAKAR MOUDGIL
ANISH DAYAL
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
