Ravi Shankar v. Rajwinder Singh Bhatti

Delhi HC1 Apr 2025CONT.CAS(C)/489/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CONT.CAS(C) 489/2025; Ravi Shankar v. Rajwinder Singh Bhatti; Delhi High Court; contempt of court; wilful disobedience; W.P.(C) 12478/2018; Central Industrial Security Force (CISF); Annexure P-4; order dated 19.12.2024; Disciplinary Committee; penalty; lady Constable Kumari Anita; disposed with liberty to seek legal recourse; Anish Dayal; 01.04.2025.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to seek relief in accordance with law, and in consonance of what has been directed by this Court. ¶¶16

Ravi Shankar Vs Rajwinder Singh Bhatti — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~71

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 489/2025

¶4

RAVI SHANKAR .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. P Sureshan, Adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

RAJWINDER SINGH BHATTI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh, SPC with Ms. Tarveen Singh Nanda, Govt. Pleader & Mr. G.S. Rathore, AC/CISF, Mr. Prahlad Devenda, SI/CISF, Mr. Yespal, Insp./CISF.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

¶9

O R D E R % 01.04.2025

¶10

This petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of order dated 13^th August 2024 passed in W.P.(C) 12478 /2018 . The relevant aspects of the order are contained in paragraph 6 which is extracted as under:

¶11

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/04/2025 at 13:53:55

¶12

Issue Notice.

¶13

Notice is accepted by counsel for respondent, who points to Annexure P-4, where order dated 19^th December 2024 has indeed been passed by the Central Industrial Security Force ( CISF ), pursuant to the directions of this Court as noted above.

¶14

The matter has been examined and issue of penalty granted to lady Constable Kumari Anita has also been considered and assessed. A perusal of the said order bears out, that the conclusion arrived at is - there is no cogent reason to interfere with the orders passed by the Disciplinary Committee .

¶15

It is noted from order dated 13^th August 2024, that the Court had stated that in case the petitioner is still aggrieved, it will be open for him to seek legal recourse as per law.

¶16

Contempt petition (CONT.CAS(C) 489/2025) is disposed of, with liberty to petitioner to seek relief in accordance with law, and in consonance of what has been directed by this Court.

¶17

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶18

ANISH DAYAL, J

¶19

APRIL 1, 2025/ ak/tk

¶20

Ravi Shankar v. Rajwinder Singh Bhatti

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Shankar v. Rajwinder Singh Bhatti

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ankit Sharma Vs Shri Dharmendra & Ors.

M/S Integrated Project Logistics Private Limited through Mr. Manoj Roy Director Vs Shri Virender Singh Khati

Muskan Arora Vs Ajay Grover

Poonam Bisht Vs Samrat Singh Rawat & Ors.

Abhishek Verma Vs Ankit Chauhan

Sanjay Yadav Vs Shri Gyanesh Bharti Commissioner & Ors.

Reema Malik Vs Inspector Manoj Kumar & Ors.

Omkara Pvt. Iti and Anr. & Anr. Vs Ms Trishaljit Sethi

Shri R.N. Dhaka Vs Shri Surya Bhan Gautam

Ankit Sharma Vs Shri Dharmendra & Ors.

M/S Integrated Project Logistics Private Limited through Mr. Manoj Roy Director Vs Shri Virender Singh Khati

Lt. Col. M. B. Roshini Vs Dr. Ajay Kumar and Ors.

Abhishek Verma Vs Ankit Chauhan

Sanjay Yadav Vs Shri Gyanesh Bharti Commissioner & Ors.