Disposed¶18

Sahu Construction v. National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited

Delhi HC15 Dec 2025O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)/497/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Sahu Construction v. National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited; O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 497/2025 with I.A. 30179/2025, I.A. 30180/2025, I.A. 30182/2025, I.A. 30444/2025; High Court of Delhi; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium Prasad; order dated 15.12.2025; remedial work to be completed within two months; Respondent not to proceed with fresh tender if remedial works completed; communications dated 04.09.2025 and 29.10.2025; petition disposed of as infructuous; liberty to approach Court again.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; Petition disposed of as infructuous along with pending application(s), with liberty to the Petitioner to approach the Court again if need arises in future. ¶18

Sahu Construction Vs National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~68

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 497/2025 & I.A. 30179/2025, I.A. 30180/2025

¶4

I.A. 30182/2025, I.A. 30444/2025

¶5

SAHU CONSTRUCTION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Taneja, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar, Mr. Amit Yadav, Advocates

¶6

versus

¶7

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Ajay Pal Kullat, Mr. Arun Sanwal, Mr. Aditya Mani Sharma, Advocates

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 15.12.2025

¶11

Learned Counsel for the Respondent draws attention of this Court to the communications dated 04.09.2025 and 29.10.2025 sent by the Respondent to the Petitioner, to state that it is open for the Petitioner to complete the remedial work within a period of two months. He further states that the Respondent is still prepared to stand by the contents of the communications dated 04.09.2025 and 29.10.2025.

¶12

Considering the above submission, this Court is of the opinion that it is implied that if Petitioner is prepared to complete the remedial works, the Respondent will not proceed ahead with a fresh tender.

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2025 at 12:49:42

¶15

Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner states that since the Petitioner is being permitted to continue the work, at this juncture, no dispute lies between the Parties.

¶16

The above statements of the Petitioner and the Respondent are taken on record.

¶17

Needless to state, endeavour shall be made by the Petitioner to complete the work within a period of two months from today.

¶18

With these observations, the Petition is disposed of as infructuous, along with pending application(s), if any.

¶19

It is always open for the Petitioner to approach this Court again, in case need arises in future.

¶20

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J

¶21

DECEMBER 15, 2025 S. Zakir

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2025 at 12:49:42

Sahu Construction v. National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sahu Construction v. National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Clix Capital Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Stylework Innovation Hub Private Limited & Anr.

Paramount Wires and Cables Ltd. Vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

M/S Mercury Car Rentals Private Limited Vs M/S Shiva Industrial Security Agency Gujrat Limited

M/S Rajendra Singh Security Agency Vs NTPC Limited

M/S Nitigya Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Vrv Hospitality Pvt. Ltd.

Sunbir Singh Wadhwa Vs Entertainment City Limited