Arbitration petitions earlier adjourned sine die awaiting an Apex Court decision are now disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to re-approach so that withdrawal under Order XXIII Rule 1(4)(b) CPC is not triggered.
Petitions disposed of; liberty granted to petitioner to re-approach the Court if occasion so arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~77 & 78
versus ENTERTAINMENT CITY LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Siddharth Batra, Ms. Shivani Chawla & Mr. Chinmay Dubey, Advocates + ARB.P. 515/2022 & I.A. 19446/2022 SUNBIR SINGH WADHWA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Apoorva Bhumesh, Ms. Madhavi Khare, Advocates
versus ENTERTAINMENT CITY LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Siddharth Batra, Ms. Shivani Chawla & Mr. Chinmay Dubey, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R % 15.12.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/12/2025 at 11:43:15
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
DECEMBER 15, 2025 Prateek
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/12/2025 at 11:43:15
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. v. Shahaji Bhanudas BhadRelied on¶2
HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. v. Shahaji Bhanudas Bhad, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3190 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunbir Singh Wadhwa
Entertainment City Limited
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
