Petition in a partition matter became infructuous as the trial court passed the final decree; counsel sought withdrawal and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~58
SH PARVEEN KUMAR RASTOGI & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Ms. Pallavi Vashist, Advocate.
versus
SH RADHEY SHYAM RASTOGI & ORS. .....Respondents Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
% 12.02.2025 CM APPL. 8267/2025 (exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
This application stands disposed of.
CM(M) 280/2025 & CM APPL. 8268/2025 (for summoning TCR), CM
APPL. 8266/2025 (stay)
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2025/ vd /ia
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/02/2025 at 12:20:46
SH PARVEEN KUMAR RASTOGI & ORS.
SH RADHEY SHYAM RASTOGI & ORS.
RAVINDER DUDEJA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
