The High Court of Delhi, through Justice Ravinder Dudeja, dismissed a writ petition of Vijay Bansal as withdrawn. The petitioner was granted liberty to file a fresh petition if so advised after admitting missing essential facts during filing.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition if so advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~66
VIJAY BANSAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Avnish Kumar Tyagi & Ms. Shreshtha Rao, Advs alongwith petitioner in person.
versus
BEENA TRIPATHI .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R % 11.02.2025
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
FEBRUARY 11, 2025 Sk/fs
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/02/2025 at 12:41:11
Vijay Bansal
Beena Tripathi
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
