The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the instant petition and engage in fresh proceedings before a Roster Bench. The High Court recorded the counsel's statement and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive legal issue was decided as the matter was procedural.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
VINAY KUMAR SONI .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Gita Dhingra, Adv.
versus
VIJAY KUMAR & ANR. .....Respondents
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
FEBRUARY 13, 2025/ib/n
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/02/2025 at 12:00:41
Vinay Kumar Soni
Vijay Kumar
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
