Plaintiff sought directions to expedite disposal of his partition suit or to have it decided; after counsel noted his own late amendment application, the petition was withdrawn and dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~84
NARENDER YADAV .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rishipal Singh, Advocate
versus
RAJINDER YADAV & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R % 08.10.2025
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
OCTOBER 8, 2025/as
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2025 at 14:21:46
Narender Yadav
Rajinder Yadav
& Anr.
Girish Kathpalia
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
