Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a petition stating parties had amicably settled disputes. Court allowed withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
GAURAV RASTOGI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mayank Rana, proxy counsel along with petitioner (through VC)
versus
SUMITA RASTOGI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Siddharth Jain, Mr. Shubham Saigal, Ms. Shruti Priya Mishra and Mr. Sachin Jain, Advocates (through VC)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R % 09.10.2025
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
OCTOBER 9, 2025/So
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2025 at 12:00:54
Gaurav Rastogi
Sumita Rastogi
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
