Allowed

Indo Alusys Facade Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Forever Infrabuild India LLP

Delhi HC19 Nov 2025ARB.P./1545/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the petitioner sought appointment of an arbitrator for a dispute regarding outstanding payments. The court found a valid arbitration clause in the work order and directed the appointment of a sole arbitrator.

What did the court decide?

The petition was allowed and Mr. Devansh Gupta was appointed as Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties under the aegis of DIAC.

Indo Alusys Facade Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Forever Infrabuild India… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~8

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 1545/2025

¶4

INDO ALUSYS FACADE SOLUTIONS PVT LTD ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Banati, Mr. Ashish Sareen Mr. Adil Asghar, Mr. Aditya Mishra, Advs. versus

¶5

FOREVER INFRABUILD INDIA LLP .....Respondent Through: Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Ms. Poonam Sharma, Mr. Shivam Tyagi, Mr. Kunal Tyagi, Advs.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R

¶7

% 19.11.2025

¶8

This is a petition under Section 11(5) and 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an Arbitrator.

¶9

The brief facts of the case are that the respondent placed work order no. T-2024-25/32/0016 dated 02.09.2024 on the Petitioner for supply and installation of structural glazing wall system at Project "Saya South X", Greater Naida, Gautam Budh Nagar, UP-201306.

¶10

The Work Order contains an arbitration clause being clause No. 12 which reads as under:

¶11

“ 12. DISPUTE RESOLUTION & ARBITRATION:

¶12

In case of any dispute, the same shall be settled amicably by both parties and if it could not be settled despite genuine efforts by both parties within 30 calendar days of the date of arising of such dispute, the same shall be referred to a panel of two arbitrators, one from each party. The parties shall appoint their arbitrators within 60 calendar days from the date of

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/11/2025 at 12:04:36

¶15

arising of the dispute. Such appointed two arbitrators by the parties, then shall appoint the third arbitrator within 7 calendar days of their appointment. If either of the parties fails to appoint it's arbitrator within the given timelines, the arbitrator appointed by the other party shall act as the sole arbitrator for resolution of the dispute. The procedure shall be governed by the Indian Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 or any modifications thereof. The venue of Arbitration shall be Gautam Buddha Nagar. With respect to this WO, the courts of New Delhi shall have exclusive jurisdiction in connection with this WO. Cost of Arbitration and jurisdiction shall be shared equally between the parties.”

¶16

The petitioner raised 5 running bills on the respondent for the work done but only part payments were made and there are amounts outstanding. 5. Hence the petitioner invoked arbitration vide legal notice dated 18.06.2025 and thereafter filed the present petition. 6. Mr. Tyagi, learned counsel appears for the respondent and has no objection to the petition being allowed as long as all claims, counter-claims and legal objections of the respondent are left open.

¶17

I am satisfied that there is a valid arbitration clause and there are disputes between the parties which need to be resolved through the arbitral mechanism.

¶18

For the said reasons, the petition is allowed and the following directions are issued:-

¶19

i) Mr. Devansh Gupta (Advocate) (Mob. No. 9871209110) is appointed as a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/11/2025 at 12:04:36

¶22

the parties.

¶23

ii) The arbitration will be held under the aegis and rules of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi (hereinafter, referred to as the ‘DIAC’).

¶24

iii) The remuneration of the learned Arbitrator shall be in terms of DIAC (Administrative Cost and Arbitrators’ Fees) Rules, 2018.

¶25

iv) The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration in terms of Section 12 of the Act prior to entering into the reference.

¶26

v) It is made clear that all the rights and contentions of the parties, including as to the arbitrability of any of the claim, any other preliminary objection, as well as claims/counter-claims and merits of the dispute of either of the parties, are left open for adjudication by the learned arbitrator.

¶27

vi) The parties shall approach the learned Arbitrator within two weeks from today.

¶28

The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶29

JASMEET SINGH, J

¶30

NOVEMBER 19, 2025/AS

¶31

This is a digitally signed order.

¶32

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/11/2025 at 12:04:36

Indo Alusys Facade Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Forever Infrabuild India LLP

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indo Alusys Facade Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Forever Infrabuild India LLP

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suman Kumar Seth Vs Neelu Kapur

Kleio Solar Power Private Limited Vs Vestas Wind Technology India Private Limited

M/S Tewatia Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs Public Works Department Govt of NCT of Delhi

National Skill Development Corporation Vs M/S Sunrise Computers Software Limited Others

Spacio Interspace Vs Te Hospitality and Estates Ltd.

Axis Finance Limited Vs Medicharla Siva Tata Rao Naidu & Anr.