Arbitration petition settled between the parties; petitioner sought and obtained leave to withdraw the petition, which was dismissed as withdrawn by the Delhi High Court. No substantive ruling was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
TATA CAPITAL LIMITED
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Nachiketa Suri and Mr. Raj Kumar, Advs. versus
FRISCO FAB DYEING AND PRINTING PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. Sidharth Aggarwal, Adv for R2
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 18.11.2025
JASMEET SINGH, J
NOVEMBER 18, 2025 / (MS)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/11/2025 at 12:05:07
Tata Capital Limited
Frisco Fab Dyeing and Printing Private Limited & Ors.
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
