Income tax writ petition withdrawn by the petitioner at counsel's instruction; the High Court dismissed it as withdrawn and declared the pending application infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sumit K. Batra, Mr. Manish Khurana and Ms. Priyanka Jindal, Advs.
versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 19 (1), DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. Anant Mann, JSC
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR O R D E R
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
VINOD KUMAR, J
SEPTEMBER 15, 2025 ss
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/09/2025 at 12:33:22
PREMIUM ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 19 (1), DELHI
V. KAMESWAR RAO
VINOD KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
