Ravi Kumar Dogra v. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Delhi High Court division bench (Navin Chawla and Madhu Jain, JJ.) order dated 17.10.2025 dismissing Review Pet. 529/2025 filed by respondent nos. 1 and 2 (Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. and ors.; counsel Jagdish Chandra, CGSC and Sujeet Kumar) against writ petitioner Ravi Kumar Dogra (counsel Manoranjan Mishra) in W.P.(C) 5186/2019. Review sought under Section 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC against judgment dated 16.09.2025. Ground: alleged concealment by writ petitioner of cognizance taken on 07.03.2023 by Metropolitan Magistrate in Criminal Case No. 12906/2022 arising from FIR No. 369/2015, P.S. K.N. Katju Marg, Delhi; held to have no bearing on the judgment; review petition dismissed.
What did the court decide?
The Court rejected the concealment ground, holding that the fact of cognizance having been taken by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate on 07.03.2023 in Criminal Case No. 12906/2022 (from FIR No. 369/2015) could have no bearing on its judgment dated 16.09.2025.