Sam Mathews Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

The respondents claim the land in question to be forest land. The impugned notice was issued acting upon the report of the Special Task Force that there are encroachments in Khasra no. 532.

¶12

While issuing notice of motion vide order dated 10.05.2023, following order was passed:

¶13

“W.P.(C) 6143/2023 and CM APPL. 24200/2023

¶14

The present writ petition has been filed with prayer for declaring the notice dated 26.04.2023 issued by the Department of Forests and Wildlife, Government NCT of Delhi regarding encroachments in Khasra No. 532 in village Nebsarai, New Delhi against the petitioner, as illegal and malafide on the ground that the petitioner is residing at

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/12/2025 at 12:55:43

¶17

House No. XL-9-37 in Khasra No. 529, Nebsarai, New Delhi.

¶18

It is the case on behalf of the petitioner that he is the permanent resident of House No. XL-9-37, situated in Khasra No. 529, Nebsarai, New Delhi for the past almost 18 years. It is submitted that on 28.04.2023, a notice dated 26.04.2023 was pasted by the officials of respondent No. 1 at his house. It is submitted that the impugned notice specifies with respect to taking action on the land of the forest, which constitutes encroachment in Khasra No. 532. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the notice has wrongly been served upon the petitioner as the residence of the petitioner does not fall in Khasra No. 532.

¶19

Attention of this Court has been drawn to the Agreement to Sell as well as the Aadhaar Card, which shows that the residence of the petitioner is in Khasra No. 529. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also drawn the attention of this Court to the Demarcation Report, which shows the demarcation of the forest land. By reference to the said demarcation report, it is submitted that Khasra No. 529 does not form part of the demarcated forest land. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also relied upon copy of the site plan, which shows the demarcated area under the Forest Department. By reference to the said site plan, it is submitted that the area where the residence of the petitioner is existing i.e. Khasra No. 529, is not part of the demarcated forest land. He submits that the officials of the Forest Department have been visiting the residence of the petitioner for undertaking demolition action. Despite the petitioner showing the requisite documents that the residence of the petitioner does not fall in the demarcated area of forest, respondents have not relented in any manner. Thus, the petitioner has been constrained to file the present writ petition.

¶20

Issue notice.

¶21

Notice is accepted by learned counsel for the respondents.

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/12/2025 at 12:55:43

¶24

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that she may be granted some time to ascertain whether the notice has been issued to the petitioner mistakenly or whether the residence of the petitioner is actually situated in Khasra No. 532 in village Nebsarai, New Delhi, which is forest land.

¶25

Let reply be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter.

¶26

Considering the submissions made before this Court, it is directed that no coercive action be taken against the property of the petitioner bearing No. XL-9-37 situated in Khasra No. 529, Nebsarai, New Delhi – 110068 till the next date of hearing.

¶27

List on 18.09.2023.”

¶28

Considering that the petitioner filed this writ petition without filing a response to the notice and the factual aspects needs to be gone into. This petition is disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to file objections to the notice within four weeks from today and the respondent no. 1/ The Deputy Conservator of Forests (South), Department of Forest and Wildlife shall decide the objections before proceeding further.

¶29

The interim protection granted by this Court shall continue till the matter is decided by the respondent and two weeks thereafter to enable the petitioner to avail remedies if required.

¶30

It is clarified that on failure of the petitioner to file objections within four weeks, interim order shall stand vacated automatically without reference to the Court.

¶31

DECEMBER 3, 2025/ ‘JK’

¶32

This is a digitally signed order.

¶33

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/12/2025 at 12:55:43

Sam Mathews v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sam Mathews v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sher Singh Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Shree Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati Ptc College Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

State Bank of India Vs M/S G I Enterprises through Its Proprietor Ms Pooja Anand & Ors.

Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan through Its Commissioner Vs Sh. Tarkeshwar Tiwari

Commissioner of Delhi Police and Ors. Vs Akshika and Ors.

Bala Rani Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Nikhil Yadav Vs Reserve Bank of India and Ors.

Anand and Company Vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Krishan Chander Malik Vs State Bank of India

Mahavir Singh Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Kushal Vs Secretary, Department of Posts, Ministry of Communications and Anr.

Hemant Kumar Sharma Vs the Principal District and Sessions Judge Hqs

Kanwar Chand Bahl Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Ramesh Chand Vs Bses Ypl