Disposed¶23

Nikhil Yadav v. Reserve Bank of India and Ors.

Delhi HC4 Dec 2025W.P.(C)/16252/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bank-fraud / unauthorized-debit recovery writ (mandamus): Rs 99,489/- siphoned from IDFC First Bank a/c 10118518618 on 31.01.2025, fraud reported to bank 01.02.2025; Article 226 petition naming RBI and IDFC First Bank; withdrawn after arguments commenced and disposed of as withdrawn on 04.12.2025 by Jyoti Singh, J. Useful only for withdrawal-disposal practice; no substantive ruling on bank liability or fraud restitution.

What did the court decide?

None; writ petition withdrawn at the Petitioner's request before adjudication. Ancillary exemption application CM APPL. 66488/2025 was allowed subject to all just exceptions. ¶23

Nikhil Yadav Vs Reserve Bank of India and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~4

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 16252/2025

¶4

NIKHIL YADAV .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Ms. Iram Naaz, Mr. Aziz Hasan, Mr. Nitin Sharma and Ms. Sushree Isha, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Prashant Tripathi, Advocate for R-2 and R-3.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

¶10

O R D E R % 04.12.2025

¶11

CM APPL. 66488/2025 (Exemption)

¶12

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶13

Application stands disposed of.

¶14

W.P.(C) 16252/2025

¶15

This writ petition is filed by the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:-

¶16

“a) Issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing the Respondents to restore the amount illegally siphoned off from the Petitioner’s Saving Bank Account maintained with the Respondent No.2 and 3/IDFC FIRST BANK Account bearing No.10118518618, IFSC CODE: IDFB0020146, on 31.01.2025 by unknown third parties amounting to Rs 99,489/-( Rupees Ninety-Nine Thousand Four Hundred Eighty-Nine/-) with interest till date from the date of reporting fraud to the Respondent No.2 &3 (IDFC FIRST BANK) i.e.01.02.2025 and cost of legal proceedings.

¶17

b) Pass and other or further order(s), as the Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, for the larger interest of justice.”

¶18

W.P.(C) 16252/2025

¶19

Page 1 of 2

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2025 at 13:16:11

¶22

After canvassing some arguments, learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw this writ petition.

¶23

Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

¶24

JYOTI SINGH, J

¶25

DECEMBER 4, 2025/ RW

¶26

W.P.(C) 16252/2025

¶27

Page 2 of 2

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2025 at 13:16:11

Nikhil Yadav v. Reserve Bank of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nikhil Yadav v. Reserve Bank of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr Neha Parashar Vs National Board of Examination and Anr.

Dr Pankaj Pushkar Vs Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs & Ors.

Manisha Kumari Vs University of Delhi & Anr.

Union of India through Its Secretary & Ors. Vs Ex Sgt Subir DANDAPAT(780463-K)

Anvesh Raj Anand through His Next Friend and Natural Father Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Vs Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Mungeshpur

M/S Cl International & Anr. Vs Additional Commissioner Central Tax (Delhi West) New Delhi

Kanta Vs Union of India and Ors.

M/S Indraprastha Gas Limited Vs Ambrish Kumar

Dr Neha Parashar Vs National Board of Examination and Anr.

Manisha Kumari Vs University of Delhi & Anr.

Ganesh Kumar & Anr. Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Robin Sharma Vs Government of NCT of Delhi (through Its Chief Secretary) and Ors.

Gulshan Kumar Narang Vs Delhi Development Authority

M/S Ashutosh Infra Private Limited Vs M/S Pebble Downtown India (P.) Ltd. & Ors.