Writ petition withdrawn by petitioner with liberty to pursue a pending representation. Court disposed of the petition as not pressed and directed that the representation be considered in accordance with law within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~77
HEMANT KUMAR SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Mr. Suhani Mathur, Mr. Jatin Gaur, Mr. Akshay Saxena & Ms. Shivali Saxena, Advs.
versus
THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE HQS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J
DECEMBER 3, 2025/ ‘JK’
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/12/2025 at 12:54:47
Hemant Kumar Sharma
The Principal District and Sessions Judge HQS
Avneesh Jhingan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
