Dismissed¶23

M/S Ajitnath Alloys Private Limited v. Mangal Dev and Anr.

Delhi HC5 Dec 2025W.P.(C)/5015/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.P.(C) 5015/2025; CM APPL. 23051/2025; M/s Ajitnath Alloys Private Limited v. Mangal Dev & Anr.; High Court of Delhi; Amit Sharma, J.; order dated 05.12.2025; dismissal in default for non-prosecution; non-appearance of petitioner; Articles 226/227 Constitution of India; writ of certiorari; Labour Court Rouse Avenue Court Complex New Delhi; L.I.R No. 5283/2016; impugned award dated 05.08.2023; Presiding Officer Shri Mukesh Kumar; Nitika Bhutani Panel Counsel R-2; pending applications disposed.

What did the court decide?

Since none appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the date of hearing nor on the last date of hearing (30.07.2025), the present petition is dismissed in default for non-prosecution and disposed of accordingly. ¶23

M/S Ajitnath Alloys Private Limited Vs Mangal Dev and… — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~10

¶2

* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 5015/2025 & CM APPL. 23051/2025

¶4

M/S AJITNATH ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: None.

¶6

versus

¶7

MANGAL DEV AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nitika Bhutani, Panel Counsel for R-2.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶10

O R D E R % 05.12.2025

¶11

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶12

The present petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeks the following prayers:

¶13

“[a] pass an order as to issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other writ, thereby quashing / modifying the aforementioned impugned award dated 05. 08. 2023 which has been passed by learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Rouse Avenue Court Complex, New Delhi in L.I.R No: - 5283 / 2016 titled as Shri Mangal Dev versus Mis Ajitnath Alloys Private Limited.

¶14

[b] issue a declaration forthwith that the aforementioned passed impugned award against the petitioner/ management is illegal, invalid, and void- ab- initio.

¶15

[c] Issue rule nisi in terms of prayers (a) to (b) mentioned here in above.

¶16

[d] Summon the judicial record as to the impugned award dated 05. 08. 2023 which has been passed by learned Shri Mukesh Kumar, Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Rouse A venue Court Complex, New Delhi in L.I.R No: - 5283 / 2016 titled as Shri Mangal Dev versus Mis Ajitnath Alloys Private Limited.

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/12/2025 at 12:16:32

¶19

[e] award costs in favour of the Petitioner and against the Respondents.

¶20

[f] issue any other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case to give complete relief to the petitioner management.”

¶21

None appears on behalf of the petitioner.

¶22

There was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing as well, i.e. , 30.07.2025.

¶23

In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed in default for non-prosecution and disposed of accordingly.

¶24

Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

¶25

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶26

DECEMBER 5, 2025/bsr/db

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/12/2025 at 12:16:32

M/S Ajitnath Alloys Private Limited v. Mangal Dev and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Ajitnath Alloys Private Limited v. Mangal Dev and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Commissioner of Delhi Police and Ors. Vs Akshika and Ors.

Bala Rani Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Nikhil Yadav Vs Reserve Bank of India and Ors.

Anand and Company Vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Ex. Major General M.S. Jaswal Vs Union of India and Ors.

Atul Sharma Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Ex. Major General Ms Jaswal Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ravi Prakash Mehrotra Vs Delhi Development Authority through the Vice Chairman & Anr.

Saleem Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Anand and Company Vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Deepa Rastogi Vs Shri Ashwani Kumar

Rajender Vs Abhishek Ranjan and Ors.

Rajat Mudgal Vs Shruti Chawla

Abdiel Aircon Vs Vaseem Khan & Ors.