Allowed

Vikas Bhushan Gupta v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC7 Mar 2025W.P.(C)/2907/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition regarding conversion of electricity category from non-domestic to domestic. The court restrained the respondent from disconnecting electricity if the petitioner approaches the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum within three weeks, leaving merits open.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition allowed subject to withdrawal; petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach CGRF; restraint on disconnection granted conditional on filing within three weeks.

Vikas Bhushan Gupta Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors. — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~60

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 2907/2025

¶4

VIKAS BHUSHAN GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Gupta, Mr. Sohil Sharma, Mr. Ieshaan Gupta and Ms. Aditi Saxena, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nitika Bhutani, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Manish Srivastava, Mr. Moksh Arora and Mr. Yash Srivastava, Advocates for R-3/BSES RPL.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 07.03.2025 CM APPL. 13821/2025

¶10

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶11

Application stands disposed of.

¶12

W.P.(C) 2907/2025 & CM APPL. 13820/2025

¶13

This writ petition is preferred on behalf of the Petitioner under Article

¶14

226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:-

¶15

“(a) Pass an order thereby directing the respondent No. 3 to convert the electricity connection of the Petitioner from the category of Non-Domestic to Domestic in this present case;

¶16

(b) Direct the Respondent No. 3 to Calculate the electricity charges commencing from March’ 2010 in terms of the unit and charges which comes under the category of Domestic Tariff Category and refund the excessive amount paid by the Petitioner to the Respondent till date;”

¶17

Issue notice.

¶18

Page 1 of 3

¶19

W.P.(C) 2907/2025

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 20:56:20

¶22

Learned counsels, as above, accept notice on behalf of the respective Respondents.

¶23

Learned counsel for Respondent No.3 takes an objection to the maintainability of this writ petition on the ground that the appropriate remedy for the Petitioner to raise the dispute with respect to conversion of the electricity connection from the category of non-domestic to domestic in respect of premises bearing no. M-88 Lower Ground Floor, Greater KailashII, Delhi lies before the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (‘CGRF’). In support, reliance is placed on a Notification dated 24.06.2024 whereby in exercise of powers conferred by sub-Sections (2)(r) and (2)(s) of Section 181 read with sub-sections (5), (6) and (7) of Section 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (‘2003 Act’) and all other powers enabling in this behalf, the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC) has framed “Guidelines for establishment of the Forum and the Ombudsman for redressal of grievances of Electricity Consumers Regulation, 2024”. It is pointed out that definition of the expression ‘Grievance’ under Regulation 2(7) includes change in billing category and ownership changes. Copy of the Notification is taken on record.

¶24

Petitioner who appears in person withdraws the writ petition to take recourse to appropriate remedy before CGRF. It is however submitted that till the grievance is placed before the CGRF, Respondent No. 3/BSES RPL be restrained from disconnecting the electricity in the subject premises.

¶25

Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for in accordance with law. It is directed that in case Petitioner approaches the CGRF within three weeks from today, Respondent No.3 shall not disconnect the electricity of subject premises, till the matter is taken up for

¶26

Page 2 of 3

¶27

W.P.(C) 2907/2025

¶28

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 20:56:20

¶29

consideration by the CGRF, whereafter it will be for the CGRF to continue, vacate or modify the interim order.

¶30

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of this case and all rights and contentions of respective parties are left open.

¶31

Pending application stands disposed of.

¶32

JYOTI SINGH, J

¶33

MARCH 7, 2025

¶34

S.Sharma/shivam

¶35

Page 3 of 3

¶36

W.P.(C) 2907/2025

¶37

Vikas Bhushan Gupta v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikas Bhushan Gupta v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sushil Kumar Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Satya Gujral Vs Delhi Development Authority

Imrana Vs the Special Secretary (Home- Fsl) & Ors.

Himanshu Garg Vs Central Board of Direct Taxes & Anr.

Manish Mittal as Legal Heir of the Deceased Devender Mittal Vs Income Tax Officer Ward 58(3), Delhi & Anr.

Pushpa Rani Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Krishna Devi Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Nimit Builders Private Limited (as Successor in the Interest of Jk Jeet Clothes Private Limited and Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.

Sushil Kumar Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Madhu Aggarwal and Anr. Vs Smt Shakila Jain and Anr.

Bses Yamuna Power Limited Vs Smt. Shanaz & Ors.

M/S Shiv Shakti Foods Vs Union of India & Ors.

Regent Mall Association Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi (through Its Commissioner) & Ors.

M/S Sanjeev Kumar Kushwaha Vs Union of India & Ors.