The High Court of Delhi dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioners were not represented during the hearing and legible document copies were absent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
.....Petitioners
Through: None.
versus
BISHAMBER
.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Sushil Raaja, SPC
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN O R D E R
% 10.09.2025
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
MADHU JAIN, J
SEPTEMBER 10, 2025 /ys/ p/ik
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2025 at 12:26:10
Union of India
Bishamber
Navin Chawla
Madhu Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
