Writ petition challenging a CAT order disposing of an O.A. against the petitioner's transfer as infructuous while vacating interim protection. The High Court, without issuing notice, extended the interim order by two weeks and directed the Tribunal to decide the interim application or the later O.A. on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~67
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 10.09.2025
versus
UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr.Ajit Kumar Pathak, SPC, Mr.Ankur, GP and Ms.Akriti Pathak, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN
NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL)
CM APPLs. 56863-64/2025 (Exemption)
W.P.(C) 13879/2025 & CM APPL. 56862/2025
Page 1 of 4
WP(C) 13879/2025
Page 2 of 4
WP(C) 13879/2025
Page 3 of 4
WP(C) 13879/2025
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
MADHU JAIN, J
SEPTEMBER 10, 2025/Arya/DG
Page 4 of 4
WP(C) 13879/2025
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Tribunal's order declaring O.A. No.2340/2025 infructuous and vacating interim protection against transfer was sustainable, given the challenge pending in O.A. No.2610/2025.
AJIT KUMAR
UNION OF INDIA
NAVIN CHAWLA
MADHU JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
