Writ petition challenging the Tribunal's refusal to take additional pleadings and documents on record in a pending service matter. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, directed the documents to be taken on record, allowed the respondents twelve weeks to respond, and left merits to the Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~76
Date of decision: 09.09.2025
versus
GOVT. OF NCTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN
NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL)
CM APPL. 56617 /2025
W.P.(C) 13801/2025
Signature Not Verified
Signed By:RENUKA W.P.(C) 13801/2025 NEGI Signing Da te:1 2.09.2025 19:42:14
Page 1 of 2
observed that the pleadings in the O.A. are complete and the matter is to be finally decided.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
MADHU JAIN, J
SEPTEMBER 9, 2025/ ys/k/DG
Signature Not Verified
Signed By:RENUKA W.P.(C) 13801/2025 NEGI Signing Da te:1 2.09.2025 19:42:14
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Tribunal erred in refusing to take additional pleadings and documents on record in a pending O.A. filed in 2021?
Rakesh Kumar Gupta
Govt. of NCTD
Navin Chawla
Madhu Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
