Writ petition against income tax proceedings; after the assessment order was passed, the petitioner sought withdrawal, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
PARDEEP KUMAR GULATI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Kumail Abbas, Mr. Deepanshu Mehta and Ms. Sahar Irfan, Advs.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 50(1) DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anurag Ojha, Mr. V.K. Saksena, Ms. Hemlata Rawat & Ms. Dipak Roy, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR O R D E R % 06.11.2025
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
VINOD KUMAR, J
NOVEMBER 06, 2025 cd
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/11/2025 at 15:18:32
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/11/2025 at 15:18:32
PARDEEP KUMAR GULATI
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 50(1) DELHI
V. KAMESWAR RAO
VINOD KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
