Dismissed¶15

Sukh Dev Yadav v. New-Delhi Muncipal Council and Ors.

Delhi HC7 Nov 2025W.P.(C)/16858/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court, W.P.(C) 16858/2025 & CM APPL. 69254/2025, decided 07.11.2025 by Justices Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Anish Dayal. Street vending; Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014; survey completed 31.07.2025; petitioner Sukh Dev Yadav did not participate in survey; no vending certificate; petition dismissed; liberty to apply in future fresh survey; respondents NDMC (counsel: Sriharsha Peechara, Akshat Kulsreshtha, Sumit Ganguli) and Delhi Police SHO Sarojini Nagar (counsel: Vivek Sharma, Prernaa Singh Bakshi, Vinita); petitioner's counsel N.K. Sahoo.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to apply if the respondents in future intend to conduct a fresh survey under the Street Vendors Act, 2014; pending applications (if any) disposed of accordingly. ¶15

Sukh Dev Yadav Vs New-Delhi Muncipal Council and Ors. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~37

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 16858/2025 & CM APPL. 69254/2025

¶4

SUKH DEV YADAV .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. N.K. Sahoo, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

NEW-DELHI MUNCIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS.....Respondents Through: Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, Standing Counsel for Mr. Akshat Kulsreshtha and Mr. Sumit Ganguli, Advocates for R-NDMC.

¶8

Mr. Vivek Sharma, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr. Prernaa Singh Bakshi, Ms. Vinita, Advocates for R- Delhi Police SHO, Sarojini Nagar.

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

¶10

O R D E R % 07.11.2025

¶11

Having heard the respective counsel for some time, we are of the view that no indulgence is called for in the extraordinary jurisdiction as the survey under the provisions of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 and the scheme framed thereunder is already over on 31^st July 2025.

¶12

The fact remains that petitioner had not participated in the said survey, and it is also an admitted position on record that petitioner does not hold any vending certificate.

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/11/2025 at 15:26:52

¶14