A Delhi High Court writ petition was disposed of after the respondent indicated she no longer wished to pursue the litigation, having secured another job. The court directed that the impugned order not be enforced and left the underlying question of law open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
Through:
versus
VIJAY LAXMI .....Respondent Through: Ms.Amita Singh Kalkal and Mr.Sunil Bagai, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN
O R D E R % 15.09.2025
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
MADHU JAIN, J
SEPTEMBER 15, 2025/sg/SJ
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2025 at 12:30:53
Government of NCT of Delhi
Vijay Laxmi
Navin Chawla
Madhu Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
