The Delhi High Court dismissed the present writ petition. The Court held that without complete information regarding the total pendency of cases before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, it was not appropriate to issue directions for expeditious disposal. The petition is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~61
M/S GLOW IRRIGATION PVT LTD .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Utkarsh Gupta, Ms. Shruti Gupta and Ms. Navika Bhandari, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Kushagra Kumar and Mr. Amit Kumar Rana, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Santosh Kumar Rout, Adv. for R-2/PNB
Ms. Ekta Chaudhary and Mr. Ayush Kumar, Advs. for R-3
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R % 19.09.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/09/2025 at 12:24:43
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. SEPTEMBER 19, 2025 /sp/db
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/09/2025 at 12:24:43
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can issue directions for expeditious disposal of a pending appeal when complete information regarding total pendency is unavailable.
M/s Glow Irrigation Pvt Ltd
Union of India
Anil Kshetarpal
Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
