A CRPF constable sought to withdraw his writ petition against the Union of India and others; the Division Bench permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
CT NARESH KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ajit Kakkar and Mr. Tejas Bhonge, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vijay Joshi, CGSC with Mr. Shubham Chaturvedi, Advocate. Mr. Ajay Pal, Law Officer CRPF, Insp. Athurv, CRPF, Mr. Ramniwas Yadav, CRPF.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER (ORAL)
% 18.09.2025
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. Mr. Ajit Kakkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that his client seeks to withdraw the present writ petition.
2. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application stands disposed of.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J
SEPTEMBER 18, 2025/pa
CT Naresh Kumar
Union of India and Ors
C. Hari Shankar
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
