Disposed

Aryakul Institute of Pharmacy Sitapur v. Pharmacy Council of India

Delhi HC19 Sept 2025W.P.(C)/13647/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitions challenged a PCI decision letter ordering re-inspection of a pharmacy institute for D.Pharma approval extension. Since re-inspection was completed during the pendency, the court disposed of the petitions by directing PCI to take a final decision in accordance with law.

What did the court decide?

Direction to PCI to take a final decision in accordance with law; petitions disposed of.

Aryakul Institute of Pharmacy Sitapur Vs Pharmacy… — Education and Admissions | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~63 & 64

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 13647/2025 & CM APPL. 55983/2025 ARYAKUL INSTITUTE OF PHARMACY SITAPUR.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Akshat Singh, Ms. Dacchita and Mr. Utkarsh Kandpal, Advs.

¶4

versus

¶5

PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh and Ms. Shrishti Gautam, Advs. for PCI.

¶6

- W.P.(C) 13660/2025 & CM APPL. 56046/2025 ARYAKUL INSTITUTE OF PHARMACY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Akshat Singh, Ms. Dacchita and Mr. Utkarsh Kandpal, Advs.

¶7

versus

¶8

PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh and Ms. Shrishti Gautam, Advs. for PCI.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN O R D E R

¶11

% 19.09.2025

¶12

The present petitions have been filed seeking following identical relief:

¶13

“a. issue a Writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction to quash the impugned Decision Letter dated 27.08.2025 issued by the Respondent PCI; and

¶14

b. issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing the Respondent PCI to grant the extension of approval to the Petitioner Institute for its D.Pharma course for the academic session 2025-26; and”

¶15

Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance articulated in the present petitions is with regard

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/09/2025 at 12:14:47

¶18

to the impugned decision dated 27.08.2025 whereby the respondent/PCI decided to re-inspect the petitioners’ institutes.

¶19

He submits that during the pendency of the present petitions, since reinspection has been carried out, the present petitions can be disposed of by giving a direction to the respondent/PCI to take a final decision in accordance with law.

¶20

Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent/PCI submits that he has no objection in case such a direction is issued.

¶21

In view of the above, the petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondent/PCI to take a final decision qua the petitioner institute in accordance with law.

¶22

The petitions stand disposed of.

¶23

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J

¶24

SEPTEMBER 19, 2025/dss

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

¶26

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/09/2025 at 12:14:47

Aryakul Institute of Pharmacy Sitapur v. Pharmacy Council of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aryakul Institute of Pharmacy Sitapur v. Pharmacy Council of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ct Naresh Kumar Vs Union of India and Ors.

Smt Aradhna Sahgal Vs Union of India through Its Secretary Revenue & Anr.

Chanchal Devi Vs District Magistrate and Ors.

Union of India & Ors. Vs Satish Kumar-Iii & Ors.

Vivex Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Union of India and Ors. Vs Jwo Rajendraprasad Yadav (Retd)

Joginder Singh Sejwal Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Shri Girraj Maharaj College of Pharmacy & Anr. Vs Pharmacy Council of India

Yamuna Kamal Club Vs Delhi Development Authority and Anr.

Dr Hina Kabeer Vs National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences

Jasdeep Singh & Ors. Vs Delhi Development Authority

Shanti Amar Singh College of Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Shree Ganesh Ramleela Committee Vs Delhi Development Authority and Anr.

Rishabh Paras Vs National Institute of Open School and Anr.