Writ petition against income tax proceedings withdrawn after counsel stated the assessment order had been passed; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the assessment order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Nitin Gulati, Adv.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 58(3), DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Sr. Standing Counsel, Mr. Apoorv Agarwal, Mr. Parth Samwal, Jr. SCs, Ms Nupur Sharma, Mr. Gaurav Singh, Mr. Bhanukaran Singh Jodha, Ms Muskaan Goel, Mr. Himanshu Gaur and Mr. Nischay Purohit Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR O R D E R % 11.11.2025
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
VINOD KUMAR, J
NOVEMBER 11, 2025 dd
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/11/2025 at 13:15:21
ASHISH JAIN
INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 58(3), DELHI
V. KAMESWAR RAO
VINOD KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
