“ 14.1 The defence propogated by present appellants of suit property having been purchased by their father Jiwat Ram, is not even remotely tried to be proved. It may be seen that not even an issue was sought to be framed on this aspect. In support of these pleadings, there is absolutely no title document, pleaded or proved by appellant/ defendants. No document evidencing allotment or ownership of Kaku Ram or sale by Kaku Ram to Jiwat Ram or deposit of licence fee by Jiwat Ram etc., has been proved by defendants. Therefore, plea of defendants they inherited the suit property from their father, who had purchased the same from Kaku Ram, is not even remotely established. On the other hand, plaintiffs have claimed that their mother Krishna De vi was allottee of the suit property. The licence document is certainly not on record or in possession of plaintiffs. Nonetheless, the official witness from DUSIB (PW-2) has deposed that as per records, Krishna Devi was the allotee of plot no. C-1203. From the records, he proved the show cause notice Ex.PW211. He also deposed that in the records the receipt dated 22.08.1996 (Ex.PW111) was also contained. Therefore, whatever documents exist in the records of DUSIB, mentions Krishna Devi to be the licencee .”
