The High Court of Delhi dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on two consecutive dates.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
IZAN AHMAD .....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
SOUTH ASIAN UNIVERSITY AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr. Subharodeep Saha and Ms. Radhika Kurdutar, Advocates for South Asian University (SAU) (through VC). Mr. Pawan Narang, Sr. Panel Counsel with Mr. Rishav Dubey, Govt. Pleader and Mr. Himanshu Sethi, Advs for R-2 & 3.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 12.11.2024
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J NOVEMBER 12, 2024/MJ/DP
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/11/2024 at 12:25:53
Izan Ahmad
South Asian University
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
