Disposed

Ajay Kumar v. Office of the District and Session Judge Hq & Anr.

Delhi HC13 Nov 2024W.P.(C)/2658/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In W.P.(C) 2658/2024, the Court directed the petitioner to submit documents to establish entitlement to financial benefits from the actual promotion date (10.06.2008) following submissions by counsel.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file fresh representation with documents for respondents to decide on financial benefits from actual promotion date.

Ajay Kumar Vs Office of the District and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~39

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 2658/2024

¶4

AJAY KUMAR .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Adv. (Thr. VC)

¶6

versus

¶7

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT AND SESSION

¶8

JUDGE HQ & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, standing counsel with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Ms. Aliza Alam, Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

¶11

O R D E R % 13.11.2024

¶12

Learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2 submits that in the instant petition, the petitioner has been found to be entitled for actual promotion with effect from 10.06.2008, for the post of Junior Judicial Assistant, whereas, the date of notional promotion has been considered to be 24.04.2008.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner, who is appearing through video conferencing, contends that the petitioner confines his relief to the extent of directing the respondents to release the necessary financial benefits accruing from of the date of actual promotion i.e. 10.06.2008.

¶14

The Court finds the aforesaid prayer to be reasonable, and, accordingly, directs the petitioner to file a fresh representation along with all

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/11/2024 at 12:26:24

¶16

necessary documents to the respondent nos. 1 and 2.

¶17

On receiving of the aforesaid representation, let the same be decided by the respondents in accordance with law and all necessary benefits be extended to the petitioner, if found entitled.

¶18

With the aforesaid observations, the petitioner stands disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court, if need so arises.

¶19

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J

¶20

NOVEMBER 13, 2024 aks

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/11/2024 at 12:26:24

Ajay Kumar v. Office of the District and Session Judge Hq & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Kumar v. Office of the District and Session Judge Hq & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baljinder Kaur Sahdev Vs Greenfields Public School & Ors.

Izan Ahmad Vs South Asian University and Others

Mini Stanly Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ms. Muskan Malhotra. Vs the Commissioner of Police and Ors.

M/S Ess Advertising (Mauritius) S.N.C Et Compagnie (Previously Known as Espn Star Sports Mauritius Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.

Vikas Kaushik & Anr. Vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Ors.

Prem Wati and Others Vs Gnctd and Others & Ors.

Banwarilal Jat and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Izan Ahmad Vs South Asian University and Others

Raisina Bengali School C R Park Vs Govt of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Ors.

Syed Mohd Yahya Nizami Vs Mohd Naeem

Amar Chand and Ors. Vs Anita and Anr.

Jyoti Longchar & Ors. Vs the Principal District and Sessions Judge (H.Q), Tis Hazari Courts and Anr.

Hare Ram Mandal & Ors. Vs Principal District and Sessions Judge & Anr.