The High Court of Delhi dismissed an appeal as withdrawn due to a settlement. The court then granted a 50% refund of the court fee in an ancillary application, noting the settlement and time spent in court.
50% refund of court fee affixed in the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
RAJAN GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr Mandeep Singh Vinaik, Ms Kanishka Sharma and Ms Thanglunkim, Advocates
versus
PRADEEP KUMAR GUPTA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Manav Gupta and Ms Samiksha Jain, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R
% 06.02.2024 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RFA(OS)(COMM) 9/2023
CM 7087/2024 [ Application on behalf of the appellant for refund of Court
Fee ]
RFA(OS)(COMM) 9/2023
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:34:31
AMIT BANSAL, J
FEBRUARY 6, 2024/ sr
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
RFA(OS)(COMM) 9/2023 Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:34:31
Rajan Gupta
Pradeep Kumar Gupta
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
