The High Court of Delhi dismissed an appeal withdrawn by the appellant's counsel upon not obtaining objection from the contesting respondent's counsel.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn; pending application stands closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
ANNI SHOKEEN ..... Appellant Through: Mr Parveen Kumar, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Roshan Lal Goel and Ms Anju Gupta, Advocates for respondent Nos. 2 & 3/ MCD.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 06.02.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
1.1 Mr Roshan Lal Goel, learned counsel, who appears on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 & 3, i.e. the contesting respondents, does not object to the appeal being withdrawn.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
FEBRUARY 6, 2024 /kd
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:47:25
Anni Shokeen
Delhi Development Authority
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
