The High Court of Delhi dismissed the appeal filed by Anuradha Kashyap as withdrawn by her counsel on February 5, 2024, following a physical/hybrid hearing.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
ANURADHA KASHYAP ..... Appellant Through: Ms Preeti Singh, Mr Sunklan Porwal, Mr Rishabh Munjal, Ms Saumya Dwivedi and Ms Swithi Iyer, Advocates. versus SUSHIL KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr Raj Kumar and Mr Imran Khan, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
% 05.02.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
FEBRUARY 5, 2024 /kd
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 14:33:07
ANURADHA KASHYAP
SUSHIL KUMAR
RAJIV SHAKDHER
AMIT BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
