Appeal from a partition suit dismissed as withdrawn by the High Court of Delhi, noting that appellants have liberty to file a review petition.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to file a review petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
+ RFA(OS) 28/2024 & CM APPL. 34775/2024
SUCHITRA RAY & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr Karan Luthra with Mr Naman Gowda, Advocates along with appellants in person.
versus
SUMITRA SARKAR & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr Abhijeet Sinha, Advocate for the respondent no.1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: (ORAL)
Signature Not Verified
RFA(OS) 28/2024 Page 1 of 2
Digitally Signed By:ATUL JAIN Signing Date: 22.0 8.2024 11:47:23
superstructure could be divided by meets and bounds, which, according to the counsel for the appellants, is an error, that requires correction.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
AUGUST 9, 2024 / tr
Signature Not Verified
RFA(OS) 28/2024 Page 2 of 2
Digitally Signed By:ATUL JAIN Signing Date: 22.0 8.2024 11:47:23
Suchitra Ray & Anr.
Sumitra Sarkar & Ors.
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
